Sree Sarada Samajam vs Sandya — 1590/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULL10 11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLTR190027142025

Filing Number

2552/2025

Filing Date

21-Oct-2025

Registration No

1590/2025

Registration Date

21-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Munsiff Kodungallur

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULL10 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sree Sarada Samajam

    Adv. PRABHAKARAN T K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandya

  2. 2.Raju

  3. 3.Sunilkumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    In Execution Petition 1590/2025 before the Munsiff Court, Kodungallur, the petition filed by Sree Sarada Samajam (decree holder) against Sunilkumar, Sandya, and Raju (judgment debtors) was dismissed on 16 March 2026. The court dismissed the petition because the judgment debtors failed to appear or provide representation for three consecutive court postings, treating the non-appearance as grounds for dismissal under Order 21, Rule 10-11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Issue notice

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  6. 21-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1590/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Execution Petition 1590/2025 before the Munsiff Court, Kodungallur, the petition filed by Sree Sarada Samajam (decree holder) against Sunilkumar, Sandya, and Raju (judgment debtors) was dismissed on 16 March 2026. The court dismissed the petition because the judgment debtors failed to appear or provide representation for three consecutive court postings, treating the non-appearance as grounds for dismissal under Order 21, Rule 10-11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case