K G sreenivasan vs Sree Sarada samajam rep By President M S Venugoplan Advocate - SABALA T M — 760/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 rule 1. Status: Adjourned. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR190024012025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
2340/2025
Filing Date
22-08-2025
Registration No
760/2025
Registration Date
23-08-2025
Court
Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K G sreenivasan
Adv. Netto N J
Respondent(s)
Sree Sarada samajam rep By President M S Venugoplan Advocate - SABALA T M
Sree sarada samajam Rep by Secretary T C rajeevan
Adv. SABALA T M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Adjourned
Written Statement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Adjourned |
| 26-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 19-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 07-02-2026 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 760/2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The Munsiff's Court at Kodungallur allowed K.G. Sreenivasan's interim application (I.A. 6/2026) to advance the hearing of the main case from 13 February 2026 to 6 February 2026. Sreenivasan, a temple Thanthri (priest), sought advance hearing to obtain police assistance to perform temple rituals during the Kottikkal Bhagavathy temple festival (5-11 February 2026). The court found sufficient urgency, noting that hearing the petition on the scheduled date would render it purposeless and cause injustice to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 760/2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The Munsiff's Court at Kodungallur allowed K.G. Sreenivasan's interim application (I.A. 6/2026) to advance the hearing of the main case from 13 February 2026 to 6 February 2026. Sreenivasan, a temple Thanthri (priest), sought advance hearing to obtain police assistance to perform temple rituals during the Kottikkal Bhagavathy temple festival (5-11 February 2026). The court found sufficient urgency, noting that hearing the petition on the scheduled date would render it purposeless and cause injustice to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts