Vidhyarthadayini Sabha Represented by president Vinayakumar vs Naseema — 100651/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR190020692025

e-Filing Number

14-07-2025

Filing Number

102106/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

100651/2025

Registration Date

16-Jul-2025

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Munsiff Kodungallur

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vidhyarthadayini Sabha Represented by president Vinayakumar

    Adv. DINAL V S

  2. 2.Vidhyarthadayini Sabha Represented by Secretary Radhakrishnan

    Adv. DINAL V S

  3. 3.Vidhyarthadayini Sabha Represented by Treasurer Dinamani

    Adv. DINAL V S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Naseema

  2. 2.Sajeena

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S.651/2025 The Munsiff Court of Kodungallur dismissed a money suit filed by Vidyarthadayini Sabha (represented by its President, Secretary, and Treasurer) against Naseema, Sajeena, and Muhammed Rafi. The court found that a full satisfaction statement was filed and the claim was satisfied, rendering dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  6. 23-Sep-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  7. 16-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100651/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.651/2025 The Munsiff Court of Kodungallur dismissed a money suit filed by Vidyarthadayini Sabha (represented by its President, Secretary, and Treasurer) against Naseema, Sajeena, and Muhammed Rafi. The court found that a full satisfaction statement was filed and the claim was satisfied, rendering dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case