Saju Kuries (P) Ltd Rep by Antony V vs Ashokan — 101163/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21,10,11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLTR190019932025

Filing Number

102028/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

101163/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Munsiff Kodungallur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21,10,11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saju Kuries (P) Ltd Rep by Antony V

    Adv. JEEJO VARGHESE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashokan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Munsiff Court, Kodungallur dismissed the execution petition filed by Saju Kuries (P) Ltd. against Ashokan for recovery of Rs. 65,000 with 12% interest, holding that the petition was not maintainable. The court ruled that under Section 71 of the Chit Funds Act 1982, a Chit Fund Registrar's award can only be treated as a deemed decree of a civil court if accompanied by a mandatory certificate from the Registrar, which was absent in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101163/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff Court, Kodungallur dismissed the execution petition filed by Saju Kuries (P) Ltd. against Ashokan for recovery of Rs. 65,000 with 12% interest, holding that the petition was not maintainable. The court ruled that under Section 71 of the Chit Funds Act 1982, a Chit Fund Registrar's award can only be treated as a deemed decree of a civil court if accompanied by a mandatory certificate from the Registrar, which was absent in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case