Sathyabhama vs sundaran — 101092/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 31st March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR190019662021
Filing Number
101092/2021
Filing Date
17-12-2021
Registration No
101092/2021
Registration Date
17-12-2021
Court
Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sathyabhama
Adv. K.P.Manoj
Sanesh
Sandhya
Respondent(s)
sundaran
Kunjandi
Pradeepan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
No sitting notified
For reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 16-03-2026 | For reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.1092/2021 The Munsiff Court at Kodungallur decreed a partition suit filed by Sathyabhama, Sanesh, and Sandhya (heirs of deceased Rajan) against nine defendants seeking division of jointly-owned property. The property, established through a 1970 Land Tribunal certificate, was held in equal ¼ shares among four family branches. The court granted a preliminary decree dividing the entire property into four equal shares by metes and bounds, allotting ¼ share to the plaintiffs' separate possession, while defendants 1-2 each receive ¼ share and defendants 3-9 collectively receive ¼ share, with defendants required to pay court fees for their shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.1092/2021 The Munsiff Court at Kodungallur decreed a partition suit filed by Sathyabhama, Sanesh, and Sandhya (heirs of deceased Rajan) against nine defendants seeking division of jointly-owned property. The property, established through a 1970 Land Tribunal certificate, was held in equal ¼ shares among four family branches. The court granted a preliminary decree dividing the entire property into four equal shares by metes and bounds, allotting ¼ share to the plaintiffs' separate possession, while defendants 1-2 each receive ¼ share and defendants 3-9 collectively receive ¼ share, with defendants required to pay court fees for their shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts