National Yuva Co Operative Society Represented By Its Secretary Vijayagopal vs 1 Mrs Raghi — 100603/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1.. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 11th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR190018782025
e-Filing Number
20-06-2025
Filing Number
101910/2025
Filing Date
21-06-2025
Registration No
100603/2025
Registration Date
21-06-2025
Court
Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
National Yuva Co Operative Society Represented By Its Secretary Vijayagopal
Adv. VENKITESWARAN D T
Respondent(s)
1 Mrs Raghi
2 Mr Dinu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Call on
for evidence
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 17-11-2025 | Call on | |
| 06-10-2025 | for evidence | |
| 10-09-2025 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Munsiff Court of Kodungallur decreed the suit in favor of National Yuva Co-Operative Society against three defendants for loan recovery. The court held that defendants borrowed Rs.20,000 on 23.12.2022 with a promissory note and 16.5% interest, but defaulted on repayment despite a legal notice. The court ordered defendants to pay Rs.7,700 with 12% interest from suit date to decree date, then 6% thereafter, plus entire suit costs, finding the plaintiff's evidence credible as defendants remained absent ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Munsiff Court of Kodungallur decreed the suit in favor of National Yuva Co-Operative Society against three defendants for loan recovery. The court held that defendants borrowed Rs.20,000 on 23.12.2022 with a promissory note and 16.5% interest, but defaulted on repayment despite a legal notice. The court ordered defendants to pay Rs.7,700 with 12% interest from suit date to decree date, then 6% thereafter, plus entire suit costs, finding the plaintiff's evidence credible as defendants remained absent ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts