Unnikrishnan vs Kalesh Advocate - ANANDAN P R — 101021/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED WITH COST on 24th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR190018622021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

101021/2021

Filing Date

30-11-2021

Registration No

101021/2021

Registration Date

30-11-2021

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED WITH COST

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 7,1
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application To Recall Witness Section UnnikrishnanKalesh
IA/2/2026 Classification : Application To Receive Documents Section UnnikrishnanKalesh
IA/3/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section UnnikrishnanKalesh

Petitioner(s)

Unnikrishnan

Adv. K.GOPAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

Kalesh Advocate - ANANDAN P R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR

24-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

17-03-2026

Order/Judgement

12-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

10-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Munsiff Court of Kodungallur held that the defendant must repay Rs. 5,50,000 (advance amount) to the plaintiff with 12% annual interest from the suit date until decree, and 6% thereafter. The court found that while both parties failed to perform the contract, the plaintiff did not improperly decline to purchase the property, entitling him to a charge over the property under Section 55(6)(B) of the Transfer of Property Act. The defendant was also ordered to bear all litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Munsiff Court of Kodungallur held that the defendant must repay Rs. 5,50,000 (advance amount) to the plaintiff with 12% annual interest from the suit date until decree, and 6% thereafter. The court found that while both parties failed to perform the contract, the plaintiff did not improperly decline to purchase the property, entitling him to a charge over the property under Section 55(6)(B) of the Transfer of Property Act. The defendant was also ordered to bear all litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case