Kalyanadayini Sabha vs Asokan — 100387/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 16th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR190013702025
e-Filing Number
09-04-2025
Filing Number
101398/2025
Filing Date
11-Apr-2025
Registration No
100387/2025
Registration Date
16-Apr-2025
Court
Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur
Judge
1-Munsiff Kodungallur
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kalyanadayini Sabha
Adv. SHAJU T G
Respondent(s)
-
1.Asokan
-
2.Selvaraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Munsiff Court in Kodungallur decreed the suit filed by Kalyanadayini Sabha against defendants Asokan and Selvaraj for recovery of defaulted kuri (rotating savings group) payments. The court found that the defendants received the kuri amount under a 2014 agreement with salary charge on the second defendant but defaulted from the 32nd installment onward, and awarded Rs. 1,33,700 with 12% annual interest until decree date, then 6% thereafter, plus suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
07-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
24-Nov-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
22-Oct-2025
for evidence
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
25-Aug-2025
Bcf and steps
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
11-Jul-2025
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
16-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100387/2025
The Munsiff Court in Kodungallur decreed the suit filed by Kalyanadayini Sabha against defendants Asokan and Selvaraj for recovery of defaulted kuri (rotating savings group) payments. The court found that the defendants received the kuri amount under a 2014 agreement with salary charge on the second defendant but defaulted from the 32nd installment onward, and awarded Rs. 1,33,700 with 12% annual interest until decree date, then 6% thereafter, plus suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts