Sree Vidya Prakasini Sabha vs Mrs Sheena Manesh Advocate - GIRI P V — 100688/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21Rule10and11. Status: Sale. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLTR190012682024

Sale

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

18-05-2024

Filing Number

101292/2024

Filing Date

19-05-2024

Registration No

100688/2024

Registration Date

25-05-2024

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21Rule10and11
E.a/1/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Order / Decree Section Mrs Sheena ManeshSree Vidya Prakasini Sabha
E.a/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section Mrs Sheena ManeshSree Vidya Prakasini Sabha

Petitioner(s)

Sree Vidya Prakasini Sabha

Adv. VENKITESWARAN D T

Respondent(s)

Mrs Sheena Manesh Advocate - GIRI P V

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR

28-03-2026

Sale

24-03-2026

For Orders in EA

16-03-2026

For Counter

07-02-2026

Sale

19-12-2025

No sitting notified

Interim Orders

28-03-2026
Order
28-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: E.A.2/2026 IN E.P.688/2024 The Munsiff Court, Kodungallur dismissed the petition filed by Sheena Maneesh (judgment debtor) seeking to stay execution proceedings under CPC Sections 47 and 151. The court found that since the petition to set aside the ex parte order against her had already been dismissed, there was no basis for staying the execution. The court further noted that the judgment debtor failed to satisfy any ingredients required under Order 21 Rules 26-29 of the CPC for granting stay of execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: E.A.2/2026 IN E.P.688/2024 The Munsiff Court, Kodungallur dismissed the petition filed by Sheena Maneesh (judgment debtor) seeking to stay execution proceedings under CPC Sections 47 and 151. The court found that since the petition to set aside the ex parte order against her had already been dismissed, there was no basis for staying the execution. The court further noted that the judgment debtor failed to satisfy any ingredients required under Order 21 Rules 26-29 of the CPC for granting stay of execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case