Mohanan vs Husnul Bhanu Advocate - SURESH MURALEEDHARAN — 100465/2023

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7,1. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

For Steps Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR190011572023

Filing Number

101157/2023

Filing Date

22-May-2023

Registration No

100465/2023

Registration Date

22-May-2023

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Munsiff Kodungallur

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7,1
Ia/18/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section MohananHusnul Bhanu
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section MohananHusnul Bhanu

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohanan

    Adv. N.R.Santhosh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Husnul Bhanu Advocate - SURESH MURALEEDHARAN

  2. 2.Yumina

  3. 3.Thasina

  4. 4.Ayisha

  5. 5.Muhammad Soufu Anam,

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Mohanan v. Husnul Bhanu Advocate & Others (I.A.17/2025 in O.S.465/2023) Outcome: The petition for interim mandatory injunction was dismissed. The court found that Mohanan failed to establish a prima facie case for a prescriptive easement right over the disputed pathway. Evidence showed Mohanan had consistently used an alternative northern pathway for 50 years and received compensation from the National Highway Authority for land acquisition from that pathway. The court concluded any right to the disputed "C" schedule pathway was merely permissive, not prescriptive, and was insufficient to warrant interim relief. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  5. 26-May-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  6. 25-May-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  13. 17-Jan-2026

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  15. 15-Dec-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  16. 05-Dec-2025

    for evidence

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  17. 26-Nov-2025

    For Enquiry

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  19. 25-Oct-2025

    For cross examination.

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  20. 18-Oct-2025

    for evidence

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  21. 06-Oct-2025

    for evidence

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  22. 26-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  23. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance of Petitioner

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  24. 18-Sep-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  25. 17-Sep-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  26. 22-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  27. 26-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  28. 22-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  29. 21-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  30. 19-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  31. 31-May-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  32. 19-May-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  33. 11-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  34. 10-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  35. 05-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  36. 05-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  37. 29-Mar-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  38. 24-Mar-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  39. 22-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  40. 06-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  41. 09-Oct-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  42. 23-Jul-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  43. 30-May-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  44. 04-Apr-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  45. 06-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  46. 21-Dec-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  47. 14-Dec-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  48. 08-Dec-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  49. 01-Dec-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  50. 17-Nov-2023

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  51. 03-Nov-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  52. 26-Oct-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  53. 25-Oct-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  54. 16-Oct-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  55. 13-Oct-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  56. 03-Oct-2023

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  57. 29-Sep-2023

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  58. 23-Sep-2023

    For commission report

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  59. 18-Sep-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  60. 12-Sep-2023

    For Counter

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  61. 11-Sep-2023

    Call on

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  62. 08-Sep-2023

    Call on

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  63. 06-Jun-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  64. 05-Jun-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  65. 02-Jun-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kodungallur

  66. 22-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 22-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100465/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mohanan v. Husnul Bhanu Advocate & Others (I.A.17/2025 in O.S.465/2023) Outcome: The petition for interim mandatory injunction was dismissed. The court found that Mohanan failed to establish a prima facie case for a prescriptive easement right over the disputed pathway. Evidence showed Mohanan had consistently used an alternative northern pathway for 50 years and received compensation from the National Highway Authority for land acquisition from that pathway. The court concluded any right to the disputed "C" schedule pathway was merely permissive, not prescriptive, and was insufficient to warrant interim relief. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case