Sree Vidya Prakasini Sabha vs Mrs Sheena Manesh Advocate - GIRI P V — 100563/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21Rule10and11. Status: Sale. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLTR190010662024

Sale

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2024

Filing Number

101086/2024

Filing Date

04-04-2024

Registration No

100563/2024

Registration Date

12-04-2024

Court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur

Judge

1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order21Rule10and11
E.A/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Sree Vidya Prakasini SabhaMrs Sheena Manesh
E.A/2/2026 Classification : Petition To Set Aside Order / Decree Section Mrs Sheena ManeshSree Vidya Prakasini Sabha
E.A/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section Mrs Sheena ManeshSree Vidya Prakasini Sabha

Petitioner(s)

Sree Vidya Prakasini Sabha

Adv. VENKITESWARAN D T

Respondent(s)

Mrs Sheena Manesh Advocate - GIRI P V

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR

28-03-2026

Sale

24-03-2026

For Orders in EA

16-03-2026

For Counter in IA

07-02-2026

Sale

19-12-2025

No sitting notified

Interim Orders

28-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 100563/2024 Outcome: Petition Dismissed Sheena Maneesh sought to set aside an ex parte order passed on 28 May 2025 in execution proceedings, claiming she was unaware of the underlying cases or court notices. The Munsiff Court rejected her petition, finding her explanations unbelievable. Since notices and summons were served at her residential address where her family resides, and the petition was filed over a year later without condonation of delay, the court concluded she had means to know of the proceedings and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100563/2024 Outcome: Petition Dismissed Sheena Maneesh sought to set aside an ex parte order passed on 28 May 2025 in execution proceedings, claiming she was unaware of the underlying cases or court notices. The Munsiff Court rejected her petition, finding her explanations unbelievable. Since notices and summons were served at her residential address where her family resides, and the petition was filed over a year later without condonation of delay, the court concluded she had means to know of the proceedings and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case