Canara Bank Konathukunnu Branch Represented By Senior Manager Rani P Gopinath vs Santhosh B K — 100261/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 11th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR190007072024
e-Filing Number
29-02-2024
Filing Number
100720/2024
Filing Date
29-02-2024
Registration No
100261/2024
Registration Date
29-02-2024
Court
Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank Konathukunnu Branch Represented By Senior Manager Rani P Gopinath
Adv. ANANDAN P R, ANANDAN P R
Respondent(s)
Santhosh B K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF KODUNGALLUR
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Adjourned
BCF and steps
Adjourned
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 18-11-2025 | Adjourned | |
| 09-10-2025 | BCF and steps | |
| 23-08-2025 | Adjourned |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Munsiff Court, Kodungallur decreed Canara Bank's suit against defendant Santhosh B.K. for recovery of a PMEGP loan of Rs. 4,75,000 that defaulted after the defendant failed to make regular installment payments. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 5,61,656 with 12% interest until decree date and 6% thereafter, plus all suit costs, finding the plaintiff's documentary evidence (loan agreement and acknowledgments of debt) credible and unchallenged since the defendant remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Munsiff Court, Kodungallur decreed Canara Bank's suit against defendant Santhosh B.K. for recovery of a PMEGP loan of Rs. 4,75,000 that defaulted after the defendant failed to make regular installment payments. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 5,61,656 with 12% interest until decree date and 6% thereafter, plus all suit costs, finding the plaintiff's documentary evidence (loan agreement and acknowledgments of debt) credible and unchallenged since the defendant remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts