MUHAMMAD KUTTY vs ISMAIL — 100868/2004
Case under Civil Courts Act, 1957 (Kerala) Section ORDER7RULE1. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR190000112004
Filing Number
100628/2004
Filing Date
18-Mar-2004
Registration No
100868/2004
Registration Date
18-Mar-2004
Court
Munsiffcourt, Kodungallur
Judge
1-Munsiff Kodungallur
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUHAMMAD KUTTY
Adv. T.K.PRABHAKRAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.ISMAIL
-
2.iQBAL
-
3.SHINA
-
4.RUKIYA
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
16-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
25-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 868/2004 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The Munsiff Court rejected the plaintiffs' petition to amend the plaint in this 22-year-old boundary dispute case. The court found the amendment petition contradictory and highly belated—the plaintiffs had earlier challenged the advocate commissioner's report but now sought to amend the plaint based on that same report. The court determined that allowing the amendment would fundamentally alter the suit's nature by removing recovery of possession and mandatory injunction reliefs, and noted the plaintiffs failed to seek such amendments despite the case being tried, decreed, and appealed previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Listed to
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
24-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
23-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
21-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
18-Feb-2026
For Counter in IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
09-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
09-Jan-2026
For reports
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
19-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
29-Nov-2025
For reports
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
19-Nov-2025
Referred to Mediator
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
13-Nov-2025
Referred to Mediator
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
06-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
For Steps
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
04-Nov-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
01-Nov-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
22-Oct-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
14-Oct-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
30-Sep-2025
Declared Holidays
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
25-Sep-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
20-Sep-2025
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
11-Sep-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
27-Aug-2025
Objection
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
20-Aug-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
13-Aug-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
30-Jul-2025
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
09-Jul-2025
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
28-Jun-2025
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
26-Jun-2025
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
19-Jun-2025
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
20-May-2025
For reports
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
04-Apr-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
07-Mar-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
01-Mar-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
11-Feb-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
17-Jan-2025
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
20-Dec-2024
For commission report
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
25-Nov-2024
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
19-Nov-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
11-Nov-2024
For Steps
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
06-Nov-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
30-Oct-2024
Refer to Adalath
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
25-Oct-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
22-Oct-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
23-Sep-2024
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
22-Jun-2024
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
03-Jun-2024
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
29-Feb-2024
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
29-Nov-2023
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
20-Sep-2023
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
29-Jul-2023
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
30-May-2023
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
24-Mar-2023
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
23-Jan-2023
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
12-Dec-2022
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
31-Oct-2022
Stayed by High Court
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
31-Aug-2022
Stayed by High Court
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
30-Jun-2022
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
31-May-2022
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
31-Mar-2022
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
18-Feb-2022
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
15-Jan-2022
Declared Holidays
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
03-Dec-2021
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
26-Oct-2021
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
31-Aug-2021
With connected case
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
24-Jul-2021
Declared Holidays
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
22-Jun-2021
Adjourned
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
08-Jun-2021
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
09-Apr-2021
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
19-Feb-2021
For Steps
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
18-Dec-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
13-Oct-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
08-Sep-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
27-Jul-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
24-Jun-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
01-Apr-2020
No sitting notified
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
03-Mar-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
03-Feb-2020
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
21-Dec-2019
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
20-Dec-2018
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
23-Jan-2018
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
10-Aug-2017
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
12-Apr-2017
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
07-Jan-2017
Call on
Munsiff Kodungallur
-
18-Oct-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. 100868/2004
Case Summary: O.S. 868/2004 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The Munsiff Court rejected the plaintiffs' petition to amend the plaint in this 22-year-old boundary dispute case. The court found the amendment petition contradictory and highly belated—the plaintiffs had earlier challenged the advocate commissioner's report but now sought to amend the plaint based on that same report. The court determined that allowing the amendment would fundamentally alter the suit's nature by removing recovery of possession and mandatory injunction reliefs, and noted the plaintiffs failed to seek such amendments despite the case being tried, decreed, and appealed previously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts