State of Kerala (Police) vs PRADEEP — 872/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121(1), 296(b), 132. Status: Adjourned. Next hearing: 23rd November 2026.

Adjourned Next hearing 23-Nov-2026 in ~3 months

Cr.No.(TSR-PS-Pavaratty) - Pavaratty

CNR: KLTR180043262025

e-Filing Number

11-09-2025

Filing Number

834/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

872/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

834

Police Station

PAVARATTY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121(1), 296(b), 132

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP

Case History

  1. 23-Nov-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 19-Sep-2025

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl. M.P. No. 4017/2025 Pradeep's bail petition was allowed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chavakkad on 19 September 2025. Pradeep was accused of biting and scratching police officials during a custody operation on 11 September 2025, violating BNS sections 121(2), 296(b), and 132. The court found no need to continue detention, applying the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, and granted bail on a Rs. 30,000 bond with two solvent sureties of like amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 872/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl. M.P. No. 4017/2025 Pradeep's bail petition was allowed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chavakkad on 19 September 2025. Pradeep was accused of biting and scratching police officials during a custody operation on 11 September 2025, violating BNS sections 121(2), 296(b), and 132. The court found no need to continue detention, applying the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, and granted bail on a Rs. 30,000 bond with two solvent sureties of like amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case