SIP, Vatanappally vs Sidhik — 200266/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,294(b),34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR180006312019

Filing Number

200266/2019

Filing Date

05-Mar-2019

Registration No

200266/2019

Registration Date

05-Mar-2019

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

VATANAPPALLY

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,294(b),34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police), Vatanappally

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sidhik

  2. 2.Navab

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Accused Sidhiq was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 294(b) (obscene words) after the prosecution's sole witness (the complainant) turned hostile and testified that the matter was settled, providing no incriminating evidence. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Accused Navab remains absconding, with his case split and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Referred to Mediator

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    For framing of charge

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 10-Apr-2025

    For framing of charge

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 05-Feb-2025

    For framing of charge

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 03-Jan-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 21-Nov-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 09-Oct-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 14-Aug-2024

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 26-Jun-2024

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 26-Apr-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 15-Jan-2024

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 17-Nov-2023

    repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 29-Sep-2023

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 19-Sep-2023

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 19-May-2023

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 21-Feb-2023

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 21-Nov-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 20-Jun-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 18-Feb-2022

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 10-Aug-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 16-Feb-2021

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 22-Jul-2020

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 19-Feb-2020

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 17-Oct-2019

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 02-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 05-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200266/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Accused Sidhiq was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 294(b) (obscene words) after the prosecution's sole witness (the complainant) turned hostile and testified that the matter was settled, providing no incriminating evidence. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Accused Navab remains absconding, with his case split and refiled separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case