S I of Police vs Radhakrishanan — 201109/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417,418,420IPC. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR180005712015

Case disposed

Filing Number

207764/2015

Filing Date

27-05-2015

Registration No

201109/2015

Registration Date

27-05-2015

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

230

Police Station

GURUVAYUR

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 417,418,420IPC
Crl.mp/4954/2025 Classification : Application Seeking Exemption from Appearance of Accused Section Radhakrishanan
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Compounding Petition Section RadhakrishananS I of Police
Crl.mp/2/2026 Classification : Sanction Petition Section RadhakrishananS I of Police

Petitioner(s)

S I of Police

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Radhakrishanan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-02-2026

for evidence.

23-01-2026

Oders in CMP

16-01-2026

Call on

21-11-2025

Call on

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order

The Judicial First Class Magistrate of Chavakkad acquitted all four accused persons (Santhimadam Builders and Developers Trust, Dr. V.N. Radhakrishnan, Ramani Radhakrishnan, and S.R. Rakesh Manu) on charges of cheating and fraud (IPC sections 417, 418, 420) after allowing their compounding petition. The offences were deemed compoundable under Section 320(8) CrPC, and the complainant witness (CW1) was examined as PW1 before the petition was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-01-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial First Class Magistrate of Chavakkad acquitted all four accused persons (Santhimadam Builders and Developers Trust, Dr. V.N. Radhakrishnan, Ramani Radhakrishnan, and S.R. Rakesh Manu) on charges of cheating and fraud (IPC sections 417, 418, 420) after allowing their compounding petition. The offences were deemed compoundable under Section 320(8) CrPC, and the complainant witness (CW1) was examined as PW1 before the petition was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case