P V Dasan vs Preman — 200012/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED. on 05th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR180000362020
Filing Number
200012/2020
Filing Date
13-01-2020
Registration No
200012/2020
Registration Date
13-01-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P V Dasan
Respondent(s)
Preman
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Notice to the counsel for accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 22-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 14-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 13-05-2026 | Notice to the counsel for accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: P V Dasan v. Preman (CC 12/2020) The court convicted Preman under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing two cheques (₹75,000 each) dated 02/11/2019 that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused's defense that the cheques were given as security for an earlier 2010 transaction and subsequently misused was rejected as unsupported by evidence. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹3,00,000 (twice the cheque amount to compensate for six years of delay), with two months simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: P V Dasan v. Preman (CC 12/2020) The court convicted Preman under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing two cheques (₹75,000 each) dated 02/11/2019 that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused's defense that the cheques were given as security for an earlier 2010 transaction and subsequently misused was rejected as unsupported by evidence. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹3,00,000 (twice the cheque amount to compensate for six years of delay), with two months simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts