Fousiya vs Rasiya Advocate - AKTHAR AHAMMED — 103137/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: For evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

For evidence Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR170041122016

Filing Number

1017026/2016

Filing Date

09-Nov-2016

Registration No

103137/2016

Registration Date

09-Nov-2016

Court

Munsiff Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Munsiff Chavakkad

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fousiya

    Adv. C.I.Edison

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rasiya Advocate - AKTHAR AHAMMED

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For evidence

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    for evidence.

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  5. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  6. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  7. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  8. 04-Jun-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  9. 03-Jun-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  10. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  11. 30-May-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  12. 19-Mar-2026

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  16. 28-Nov-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Order

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Order

    Case Summary: O.S 3137/2016 (Fousiya v. Rasiya) The Munsiff Court of Chavakkad allowed the defendant's petitions (I.A 13/2025 and I.A 14/2025) to reopen evidence and summon witnesses. The suit seeks declaration that Settlement Deed No. 953/2000 is null and void. The defendant's earlier witness petitions were dismissed for lacking specified purposes; however, the court found the current petitions adequately detailed the witnesses' relevance to proving document validity and execution. The court held that witness examination is essential for fair adjudication of the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 13-Nov-2025

    Issue Summons

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  20. 07-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  21. 01-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  22. 28-Oct-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  23. 25-Oct-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  24. 21-Oct-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  26. 03-Oct-2025

    Order

  27. 03-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  28. 26-Sep-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  29. 19-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  30. 16-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  31. 09-Sep-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  32. 25-Aug-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  33. 15-Jul-2025

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  34. 23-May-2025

    For additional written statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  35. 20-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  36. 03-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  37. 29-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  38. 13-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  39. 06-Sep-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  40. 30-Aug-2024

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  41. 27-Aug-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  42. 19-Aug-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  43. 17-Aug-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  44. 13-Aug-2024

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  45. 06-Aug-2024

    For commission report

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  46. 04-Jun-2024

    Listed to

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  47. 21-Mar-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  48. 16-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  49. 12-Jan-2024

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  50. 15-Nov-2023

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  51. 07-Sep-2023

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  52. 03-Aug-2023

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  53. 04-Mar-2023

    Trial in the list

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  54. 20-Oct-2022

    Trial in the list

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  55. 19-Aug-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  56. 02-Apr-2022

    For Steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  57. 08-Dec-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  58. 27-Sep-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  59. 25-May-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  60. 01-Feb-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  61. 01-Aug-2020

    Declared Holidays

  62. 02-Mar-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  63. 09-Oct-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  64. 22-Jun-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  65. 15-Jan-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  66. 08-Nov-2018

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  67. 10-Sep-2018

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  68. 21-Jul-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  69. 16-Mar-2018

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  70. 27-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 09-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103137/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S 3137/2016 (Fousiya v. Rasiya) The Munsiff Court of Chavakkad allowed the defendant's petitions (I.A 13/2025 and I.A 14/2025) to reopen evidence and summon witnesses. The suit seeks declaration that Settlement Deed No. 953/2000 is null and void. The defendant's earlier witness petitions were dismissed for lacking specified purposes; however, the court found the current petitions adequately detailed the witnesses' relevance to proving document validity and execution. The court held that witness examination is essential for fair adjudication of the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case