G Associates vs Raju C.P Advocate - JOJO JACOB N — 101329/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

For Hearing Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR170019872019

Filing Number

101329/2019

Filing Date

26-Nov-2019

Registration No

101329/2019

Registration Date

28-Nov-2019

Court

Munsiff Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Munsiff Chavakkad

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G Associates

    Adv. Biju V.B., Biju V.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju C.P Advocate - JOJO JACOB N

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Judge on leave / duty

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  10. 21-Mar-2026

    for evidence.

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  11. 06-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  12. 28-Feb-2026

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  16. 07-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  17. 02-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  18. 28-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  19. 20-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  20. 16-Jan-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: OS 1329/2019 Outcome: Both interim applications (IA 15/2025 and IA 16/2025) filed by defendants Raju C.P and Rosily were dismissed by the Munsiff of Chavakkad on January 16, 2026. Key Issue: The defendants sought to summon witnesses and produce documents to prove that stamp papers (BE 177565 and BE 177566) allegedly produced by plaintiff G Associates during the hiring purchase agreement dispute were fabricated. The court held that since the burden of proving the transaction and document execution lies with the plaintiff, the defendants cannot compel evidence to disprove the documents through negative evidence. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 16-Jan-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  22. 07-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  23. 15-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  24. 02-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  25. 24-Nov-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  26. 19-Nov-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  27. 15-Nov-2025

    For Defendent Evidence

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  28. 04-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  29. 21-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  30. 17-Oct-2025

    Order

  31. 17-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  32. 13-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  33. 04-Oct-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  34. 29-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  35. 24-Sep-2025

    Order

  36. 24-Sep-2025

    Order

  37. 24-Sep-2025

    Order

  38. 24-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  39. 19-Sep-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  40. 17-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  41. 11-Sep-2025

    Further evidence

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  42. 04-Apr-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  43. 28-Feb-2025

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  44. 16-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  45. 22-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  46. 04-Oct-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  47. 04-Oct-2024

    Restored

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  48. 04-Oct-2024

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  49. 08-Dec-2020

    Judgement

  50. 08-Dec-2020

    Disposed

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  51. 30-Nov-2020

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  52. 10-Nov-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  53. 23-Oct-2020

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  54. 15-Oct-2020

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  55. 24-Sep-2020

    For evidence

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  56. 28-Mar-2020

    Declared Holidays

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  57. 17-Feb-2020

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  58. 27-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 26-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101329/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 1329/2019 Outcome: Both interim applications (IA 15/2025 and IA 16/2025) filed by defendants Raju C.P and Rosily were dismissed by the Munsiff of Chavakkad on January 16, 2026. Key Issue: The defendants sought to summon witnesses and produce documents to prove that stamp papers (BE 177565 and BE 177566) allegedly produced by plaintiff G Associates during the hiring purchase agreement dispute were fabricated. The court held that since the burden of proving the transaction and document execution lies with the plaintiff, the defendants cannot compel evidence to disprove the documents through negative evidence. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case