B R D Finance Limited vs Joshy Mathew — 101812/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7ruleI. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR170018002015
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
104730/2015
Filing Date
10-08-2015
Registration No
101812/2015
Registration Date
10-08-2015
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B R D Finance Limited
Adv. Geofy George.P.
Respondent(s)
Joshy Mathew
Shijo mathew
P.M.Mathew
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Call on
Stay report
Call with IA
No sitting notified
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Call on |
| 08-12-2025 | Stay report |
| 27-11-2025 | Call with IA |
| 12-11-2025 | No sitting notified |
| 11-09-2025 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 101812/2015 Outcome: Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. The Munsiff Court rejected the defendants' (Joshy Mathew, Shijo Mathew, and Leelama Mathew) application to amend their written statement in a money recovery suit based on a chitty (kuri) transaction. The court found that the proposed amendment—filed in 2021, five years after the original written statement (2016)—constituted introduction of entirely new facts and defenses rather than mere clarification of omissions, causing prejudice to the plaintiff. The substantial delay was deemed unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 101812/2015 Outcome: Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. The Munsiff Court rejected the defendants' (Joshy Mathew, Shijo Mathew, and Leelama Mathew) application to amend their written statement in a money recovery suit based on a chitty (kuri) transaction. The court found that the proposed amendment—filed in 2021, five years after the original written statement (2016)—constituted introduction of entirely new facts and defenses rather than mere clarification of omissions, causing prejudice to the plaintiff. The substantial delay was deemed unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts