Pramodh vs Sailesh Advocate - ABDUL SAMAD K H — 100635/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O26R7(1). Status: Adjourned. Next hearing: 20th August 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR170014202024
Next Hearing
20th August 2026
e-Filing Number
12-09-2024
Filing Number
101495/2024
Filing Date
12-09-2024
Registration No
100635/2024
Registration Date
12-09-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pramodh
Adv. RAJAGOPALAN C
Respondent(s)
Sailesh Advocate - ABDUL SAMAD K H
Shiji
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Adjourned
Issues
Appearance Of Parties
Order/Judgement
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Adjourned |
| 09-12-2025 | Issues |
| 07-11-2025 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 01-11-2025 | Order/Judgement |
| 25-10-2025 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: 100635/2024 The Munsiff Court of Chavakkad ALLOWED Pramod's petition for temporary injunction on 25 October 2025. The court found that Pramod owns the disputed properties per valid sale deeds and established a prima facie case with clear boundary demarcation supported by an Advocate Commissioner's report showing a 10-foot pathway on the northern boundary. The court restrained respondents Sylesh and Shiji from trespassing, demolishing the northern boundary foundation, creating new pathways, or interfering with Pramod's possession until final disposal of the suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 100635/2024 The Munsiff Court of Chavakkad ALLOWED Pramod's petition for temporary injunction on 25 October 2025. The court found that Pramod owns the disputed properties per valid sale deeds and established a prima facie case with clear boundary demarcation supported by an Advocate Commissioner's report showing a 10-foot pathway on the northern boundary. The court restrained respondents Sylesh and Shiji from trespassing, demolishing the northern boundary foundation, creating new pathways, or interfering with Pramod's possession until final disposal of the suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts