Dr A P Sathi vs Jayan Advocate - BACKER K P — 100063/2025
Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLTR170012372025
e-Filing Number
01-08-2025
Filing Number
101330/2025
Filing Date
01-Aug-2025
Registration No
100063/2025
Registration Date
01-Aug-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dr A P Sathi
Adv. SHEMI KELAMPADIKKAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayan Advocate - BACKER K P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.P 63/2025 The Rent Control Court of Chavakkad allowed Dr. A. P. Sathi's petition for eviction against tenant Jayan under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that Jayan defaulted on rent payments from July 2023 onwards, unlawfully housed migrant workers without consent, and overstayed beyond the agreed 9-month lease period. The court directed Jayan to vacate the property within one month and pay court costs, accepting the petitioner's unchallenged testimony that she needed the building for constructing residences for her co-owner children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
16-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
02-Mar-2026
Adjourned
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
21-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
06-Feb-2026
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
16-Dec-2025
For Counter
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
27-Oct-2025
For Counter
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
01-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100063/2025
Case Summary: R.C.P 63/2025 The Rent Control Court of Chavakkad allowed Dr. A. P. Sathi's petition for eviction against tenant Jayan under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that Jayan defaulted on rent payments from July 2023 onwards, unlawfully housed migrant workers without consent, and overstayed beyond the agreed 9-month lease period. The court directed Jayan to vacate the property within one month and pay court costs, accepting the petitioner's unchallenged testimony that she needed the building for constructing residences for her co-owner children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts