Dr A P Sathi vs Jayan Advocate - BACKER K P — 100063/2025
Case under Ia(set Aside Ex Parte Decree)/1/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Order / Decree Section JayanDr A P Sathi. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLTR170012372025
e-Filing Number
01-08-2025
Filing Number
101330/2025
Filing Date
01-08-2025
Registration No
100063/2025
Registration Date
01-08-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dr A P Sathi
Adv. SHEMI KELAMPADIKKAL
Respondent(s)
Jayan Advocate - BACKER K P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Adjourned
FOR HEARING
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Adjourned |
| 21-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 06-02-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R.C.P 63/2025 The Rent Control Court of Chavakkad allowed Dr. A. P. Sathi's petition for eviction against tenant Jayan under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that Jayan defaulted on rent payments from July 2023 onwards, unlawfully housed migrant workers without consent, and overstayed beyond the agreed 9-month lease period. The court directed Jayan to vacate the property within one month and pay court costs, accepting the petitioner's unchallenged testimony that she needed the building for constructing residences for her co-owner children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.P 63/2025 The Rent Control Court of Chavakkad allowed Dr. A. P. Sathi's petition for eviction against tenant Jayan under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that Jayan defaulted on rent payments from July 2023 onwards, unlawfully housed migrant workers without consent, and overstayed beyond the agreed 9-month lease period. The court directed Jayan to vacate the property within one month and pay court costs, accepting the petitioner's unchallenged testimony that she needed the building for constructing residences for her co-owner children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts