Malu vs Gopinathan — 100166/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1. Status: Pre trial steps. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR170001902017
Filing Number
100166/2017
Filing Date
18-Jan-2017
Registration No
100166/2017
Registration Date
18-Jan-2017
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malu
Adv. T.N.SOMASEKHARAN AND C RAJAGOPALAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gopinathan
-
2.Venugopalan
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Pre trial steps
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
16-Mar-2026
For Steps
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
17-Dec-2025
For Steps
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
26-Sep-2025
For Steps
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
13-Aug-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
23-May-2025
For Steps
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
18-Feb-2025
For Steps
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
19-Dec-2024
Issues
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
13-Nov-2024
Issues
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
30-Sep-2024
Issues
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
24-Jul-2024
Referred to Mediator
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
29-May-2024
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
20-Jan-2024
Call on
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
18-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
07-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
19-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
14-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
14-Nov-2022
Restored
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
05-Oct-2019
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 100166/2017 (Malu v. Gopinathan & Venugopalan) The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of plaintiff Malu. The court found that Malu holds an easement by prescription over a 12-foot-wide motorable way (Plaint B schedule property) to access her property, which was originally part of the same land ownership. The defendants were permanently restrained from obstructing the plaintiff or her family members from using this way and ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff. The defendants' failure to file a written statement and the unchallenged testimony of the plaintiff established her rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Oct-2019
Disposed
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
24-Sep-2019
Order/Judgement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
24-Aug-2019
for evidence.
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
14-Jun-2019
No sitting notified
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
14-Jun-2019
No sitting notified
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
25-Mar-2019
Written Statement
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
10-Dec-2018
No sitting notified
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
26-Oct-2018
For Written Statement on Counter Claim
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
19-Jul-2018
For Written Statement on Counter Claim
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
22-May-2018
For Written Statement on Counter Claim
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
11-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 100166/2017
Case Summary: 100166/2017 (Malu v. Gopinathan & Venugopalan) The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed in favor of plaintiff Malu. The court found that Malu holds an easement by prescription over a 12-foot-wide motorable way (Plaint B schedule property) to access her property, which was originally part of the same land ownership. The defendants were permanently restrained from obstructing the plaintiff or her family members from using this way and ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff. The defendants' failure to file a written statement and the unchallenged testimony of the plaintiff established her rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts