Octal Finance Private limited vs Mini — 89/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR170001542026

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

Munsiff Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Munsiff Chavakkad

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Octal Finance Private limited

    Adv. CIJO M CHERUVATHOOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mini

  2. 2.Viswanathan

  3. 3.Thanka

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Summary of Case 89/2026 The Munsiff's Court decreed Octal Finance Private Limited's suit for loan recovery against defendants Mini, Viswanathan, and Thanka, who had defaulted on a ₹50,000 personal loan. The court held defendants jointly and severally liable to pay ₹42,480 (59 outstanding instalments of ₹720 each) with 12% per annum interest from suit date to decree and 6% thereafter, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed 18% interest rate. Defendants were also ordered to pay suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Chavakkad

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 89/2026 The Munsiff's Court decreed Octal Finance Private Limited's suit for loan recovery against defendants Mini, Viswanathan, and Thanka, who had defaulted on a ₹50,000 personal loan. The court held defendants jointly and severally liable to pay ₹42,480 (59 outstanding instalments of ₹720 each) with 12% per annum interest from suit date to decree and 6% thereafter, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed 18% interest rate. Defendants were also ordered to pay suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case