Bharathakshemam Company By Chairman Thomas vs Nisha Krishnakumar — 100026/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R5466. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 05th June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLTR170001162025
e-Filing Number
18-01-2025
Filing Number
100127/2025
Filing Date
23-Jan-2025
Registration No
100026/2025
Registration Date
23-Jan-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bharathakshemam Company By Chairman Thomas
Adv. JAYASREE P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nisha Krishnakumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
OrderView PDF
The Munsiff Court, Chavakkad dismissed the execution petition (EP 26/2025) filed by Bharathakshemam Company against judgment debtor Nisha Krishnakumar. The court found that despite sufficient time and opportunity granted, the decree holder failed to produce necessary paper publication, resulting in dismissal of the execution proceedings under Order 21, Rules 54-66 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
16-Mar-2026
Return of notice
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
02-Feb-2026
For paper Publication
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
21-Jan-2026
Take steps last chance
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
14-Nov-2025
Return of notice
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
26-Sep-2025
Notice in Ca
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
03-Jun-2025
Notice in Ca
Munsiff Chavakkad
-
21-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100026/2025
The Munsiff Court, Chavakkad dismissed the execution petition (EP 26/2025) filed by Bharathakshemam Company against judgment debtor Nisha Krishnakumar. The court found that despite sufficient time and opportunity granted, the decree holder failed to produce necessary paper publication, resulting in dismissal of the execution proceedings under Order 21, Rules 54-66 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts