Sulekha vs Geevar — 100180/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR170000602014
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1002834/2014
Filing Date
21-01-2014
Registration No
100180/2014
Registration Date
21-01-2014
Court
Munsiff Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sulekha
Adv. K.I.Chacko
Respondent(s)
Geevar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Chavakkad
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 24-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 19-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 11-02-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Munsiff Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of possession and mandatory injunction regarding an allegedly encroached property. While the court found the plaintiff had legal title to the disputed property under a 1987 settlement deed (holding the unilateral cancellation by her husband void), it found against her on possession and injunction claims because she failed to establish the exact identity and extent of the encroached portion and provided no convincing evidence of the alleged boundary wall construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Munsiff Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of possession and mandatory injunction regarding an allegedly encroached property. While the court found the plaintiff had legal title to the disputed property under a 1987 settlement deed (holding the unilateral cancellation by her husband void), it found against her on possession and injunction claims because she failed to establish the exact identity and extent of the encroached portion and provided no convincing evidence of the alleged boundary wall construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts