Vincent vs Abdul Rahiman Shamsuddeen — 300054/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,7,1,2,3,4,5,6. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR160002042019

No sitting notified

Next Hearing

22nd May 2026

Filing Number

300054/2019

Filing Date

09-04-2019

Registration No

300054/2019

Registration Date

09-04-2019

Court

Sub Court, Chavakkad

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Chavakkad

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26,7,1,2,3,4,5,6

Petitioner(s)

Vincent

Adv. T.S.Ajith

Respondent(s)

Abdul Rahiman Shamsuddeen

Abdul Rahiman Shamsuddeen

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Chavakkad

07-04-2026

No sitting notified

11-03-2026

No sitting notified

02-02-2026

No sitting notified

10-12-2025

Listed to

09-10-2025

Stayed. Call on

Interim Orders

15-09-2021
Judgement
18-03-2023
Judgement

Case Summary The Sub Judge court decreed the plaintiff's suit in this property sale dispute. The plaintiff (Vincent) successfully proved he executed an agreement with the second defendant (the power of attorney holder) to purchase property for ₹60,00,000 and paid ₹22,00,000 in advance. When the defendants failed to complete the sale, the court ordered them to return ₹25,13,930 with 9% interest from suit date to decree date (thereafter 6%), and imposed a charge on the property to secure the debt, with plaintiff entitled to litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sub Judge court decreed the plaintiff's suit in this property sale dispute. The plaintiff (Vincent) successfully proved he executed an agreement with the second defendant (the power of attorney holder) to purchase property for ₹60,00,000 and paid ₹22,00,000 in advance. When the defendants failed to complete the sale, the court ordered them to return ₹25,13,930 with 9% interest from suit date to decree date (thereafter 6%), and imposed a charge on the property to secure the debt, with plaintiff entitled to litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Chavakkad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case