Shaija Jose vs Jose P A — 100077/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLTR150036802022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8221/2022
Filing Date
17-08-2022
Registration No
100077/2022
Registration Date
17-08-2022
Court
JFCM, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaija Jose
Adv. LINA JOSEPH
Mary Eminta
Respondent(s)
Jose P A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
No sitting notified
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 31-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 28-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Irinjalakuda Judicial First Class Magistrate granted a domestic violence petition filed by a wife and daughter against the husband/father under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found the respondent guilty of physical and mental harassment, establishing domestic violence through witness testimony. The court ordered the respondent to: (1) refrain from committing domestic violence; (2) grant temporary custody of the minor child to the petitioner; (3) pay Rs.10,000 monthly maintenance to each petitioner; (4) arrange alternate accommodation and pay Rs.10,000 monthly rent; and (5) return the petitioner's belongings within two months. The court rejected the claim for property transfer as outside its jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Irinjalakuda Judicial First Class Magistrate granted a domestic violence petition filed by a wife and daughter against the husband/father under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found the respondent guilty of physical and mental harassment, establishing domestic violence through witness testimony. The court ordered the respondent to: (1) refrain from committing domestic violence; (2) grant temporary custody of the minor child to the petitioner; (3) pay Rs.10,000 monthly maintenance to each petitioner; (4) arrange alternate accommodation and pay Rs.10,000 monthly rent; and (5) return the petitioner's belongings within two months. The court rejected the claim for property transfer as outside its jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts