Ratnakumari vs Vasanthi — 300128/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order9,act151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Restor.Ptn - RESTORATION PETITION

CNR: KLTR140032402023

e-Filing Number

22-11-2023

Filing Number

303368/2023

Filing Date

23-Nov-2023

Registration No

300128/2023

Registration Date

30-Nov-2023

Court

Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

2-Additional Munsiff

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order9,act151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ratnakumari

    Adv. CLETUS THOTTAPPILLY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasanthi

  2. 2.Sasidharan

  3. 3.Mohanan

  4. 4.Lathika

  5. 5.Akshay

  6. 6.Anubhava

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Munsiff Court allowed the plaintiff's restoration petition, setting aside the default dismissal order dated 16.10.2023. The court found that the 65-year-old plaintiff's absence due to age-related ailments and fever was sufficiently justified to warrant a fair opportunity to proceed with her perpetual injunction suit, particularly given no delay in filing the restoration petition. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 payable to the defendants within 7 days as a condition for restoration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Munsiff

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional Munsiff

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional Munsiff

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Declared Holidays

    Additional Munsiff

  7. 24-Oct-2025

    For paper Publication

    Additional Munsiff

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    Issue notice

    Additional Munsiff

  11. 12-Feb-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  12. 07-Jan-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  13. 29-Nov-2024

    For appearence of plaintiff/defendent

    Additional Munsiff

  14. 01-Oct-2024

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  15. 24-Jul-2024

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  16. 12-Jul-2024

    Objection

    Additional Munsiff

  17. 24-May-2024

    Objection

    Additional Munsiff

  18. 03-Apr-2024

    Call on

    Additional Munsiff

  19. 17-Feb-2024

    Call on

    Additional Munsiff

  20. 03-Jan-2024

    Call on

    Additional Munsiff

  21. 01-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 23-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300128/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff Court allowed the plaintiff's restoration petition, setting aside the default dismissal order dated 16.10.2023. The court found that the 65-year-old plaintiff's absence due to age-related ailments and fever was sufficiently justified to warrant a fair opportunity to proceed with her perpetual injunction suit, particularly given no delay in filing the restoration petition. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 payable to the defendants within 7 days as a condition for restoration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case