Lalithamani vs Kochammani — 301685/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 211110. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 26th May 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLTR140023162024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-07-2024

Filing Number

302366/2024

Filing Date

24-07-2024

Registration No

301685/2024

Registration Date

30-07-2024

Court

Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

1-Principal Munsiff

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 211110
E.a/1649/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section Lalithamani
E.a/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Lalithamani

Petitioner(s)

Lalithamani

Adv. SUBASH CHANDRA BABU V G

Geetha

Adv. SUBASH CHANDRA BABU V G

Sarath Chandran

Adv. SUBASH CHANDRA BABU V G

Respondent(s)

Kochammani

Girija

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff

26-05-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

16-03-2026

FOR HEARING

12-03-2026

FOR HEARING

28-02-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

26-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: 301685/2024 The Munsiff Court dismissed the execution petition seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to enforce a 2012 decree. The court found that while the original decree restrained defendants from widening a pathway to 3 feet, a subsequent 2021 suit's judgment and a pending appeal with granted stay order rendered execution premature, as the pathway's final width remains under challenge before higher courts (Sessions Court and High Court). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 301685/2024 The Munsiff Court dismissed the execution petition seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to enforce a 2012 decree. The court found that while the original decree restrained defendants from widening a pathway to 3 feet, a subsequent 2021 suit's judgment and a pending appeal with granted stay order rendered execution premature, as the pathway's final width remains under challenge before higher courts (Sessions Court and High Court). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case