Ramankutty vs Rajan Advocate - Suresh Babu.E.B — 300651/2017
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section order7rule1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR140013442017
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
308406/2017
Filing Date
25-02-2017
Registration No
300651/2017
Registration Date
25-02-2017
Court
Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Principal Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramankutty
Adv. Vipin Vijayan
Sekharan
Sajayan
Venu
Respondent(s)
Rajan Advocate - Suresh Babu.E.B
Aravindakshan
Aju
Kocheri Dharma Daiva Kshethram Trust
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For further hearing
Call on
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 26-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 19-03-2026 | Call on |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 300651/2017 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with conditions. Plaintiffs permitted to publish newspaper notice for representative suit regarding Kocheri family temple administration, contingent on payment of Rs. 10,000 cost to defendants within 7 days; failure to pay renders order dismissed. Key Issue: Court approved delayed public advertisement under CPC Order 1 Rule 8(2), which plaintiffs failed to complete after obtaining representative capacity permission in 2017, only filing this application eight years later when defendants challenged maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 300651/2017 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with conditions. Plaintiffs permitted to publish newspaper notice for representative suit regarding Kocheri family temple administration, contingent on payment of Rs. 10,000 cost to defendants within 7 days; failure to pay renders order dismissed. Key Issue: Court approved delayed public advertisement under CPC Order 1 Rule 8(2), which plaintiffs failed to complete after obtaining representative capacity permission in 2017, only filing this application eight years later when defendants challenged maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts