Mini Jose vs Ignesius — 300660/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7,1. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR140013162022

Filing Number

300866/2022

Filing Date

07-Jul-2022

Registration No

300660/2022

Registration Date

07-Jul-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

2-Additional Munsiff

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7,1
Ia(fda)/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Mini JoseIgnesius

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mini Jose

    Adv. SUNNY.K.MANJALY

  2. 2.Thomson Jose

  3. 3.Anson JOse

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ignesius

  2. 2.Davis

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Munsiff

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Additional Munsiff

  4. 04-Dec-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  5. 08-Oct-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  6. 25-Aug-2025

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 300660/2022 The Munsiff's court in Irinjalakuda decreed a partition suit filed by Mini Jose, Thomson Jose, and Anson Jose against Ignesius and Davis regarding inherited property. The court found that a validly executed 2003 will by their grandfather Thomas bequeathed the property equally to three sons (including the plaintiffs' late father Jose), and ruled the property is partible into three equal shares—one-third for the plaintiffs jointly and one-third each for the defendants. The defendants' counterclaims regarding a prior 2003 handwritten agreement transferring property were rejected due to lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 25-Aug-2025

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  8. 02-Aug-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional Munsiff

  9. 30-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Munsiff

  10. 25-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Munsiff

  11. 15-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Additional Munsiff

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Issue Summons

    Additional Munsiff

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Listed to

    Additional Munsiff

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Additional Munsiff

  15. 03-Jan-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Additional Munsiff

  16. 19-Nov-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Additional Munsiff

  17. 26-Sep-2024

    No sitting notified

    Additional Munsiff

  18. 24-Jul-2024

    For Steps

    Additional Munsiff

  19. 11-Jun-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Additional Munsiff

  20. 17-Feb-2024

    Adjourned

    Additional Munsiff

  21. 19-Dec-2023

    Adjourned

    Additional Munsiff

  22. 20-Sep-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Additional Munsiff

  23. 09-Jun-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Additional Munsiff

  24. 01-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Additional Munsiff

  25. 20-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Additional Munsiff

  26. 23-Feb-2023

    Call on

    Additional Munsiff

  27. 28-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Additional Munsiff

  28. 03-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Additional Munsiff

  29. 09-Nov-2022

    For reports

    Additional Munsiff

  30. 28-Oct-2022

    For reports

    Additional Munsiff

  31. 13-Oct-2022

    For reports

    Additional Munsiff

  32. 29-Sep-2022

    For reports

    Additional Munsiff

  33. 20-Sep-2022

    Adjourned

    Additional Munsiff

  34. 30-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 07-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300660/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 300660/2022 The Munsiff's court in Irinjalakuda decreed a partition suit filed by Mini Jose, Thomson Jose, and Anson Jose against Ignesius and Davis regarding inherited property. The court found that a validly executed 2003 will by their grandfather Thomas bequeathed the property equally to three sons (including the plaintiffs' late father Jose), and ruled the property is partible into three equal shares—one-third for the plaintiffs jointly and one-third each for the defendants. The defendants' counterclaims regarding a prior 2003 handwritten agreement transferring property were rejected due to lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case