Rosemarry vs Joshy Advocate - K.V RAGHUTHAMAN — 300195/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7, R 1. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR140008722024
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
300896/2024
Filing Date
27-03-2024
Registration No
300195/2024
Registration Date
27-03-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Principal Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rosemarry
Adv. Alphonsa Antony
Ethen Loock Jackson (minor)
Emma mariyam Jackson (Minor)
Respondent(s)
Joshy Advocate - K.V RAGHUTHAMAN
Kochuthressia
Jaison
Joshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff
Call on
Call on
Pre trial steps
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Call on |
| 06-12-2025 | Call on |
| 04-12-2025 | Pre trial steps |
| 17-11-2025 | FOR HEARING |
| 11-11-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 300195/2024 Petition Granted. The Munsiff Court permitted Rose Mary and her minor children (ages 6 and 2½) to construct a gate on the eastern side of their residential property for child safety, as the open boundary abuts a PWD road and canal. The permission is provisional, subject to the main suit's outcome, with petitioners bearing all costs and undertaking not to claim rights over the gate if the suit is decided against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 300195/2024 Petition Granted. The Munsiff Court permitted Rose Mary and her minor children (ages 6 and 2½) to construct a gate on the eastern side of their residential property for child safety, as the open boundary abuts a PWD road and canal. The permission is provisional, subject to the main suit's outcome, with petitioners bearing all costs and undertaking not to claim rights over the gate if the suit is decided against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts