Vijayalakshmi vs Devaki — 300031/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
RP - REVIEW PETITION
CNR: KLTR140007582025
e-Filing Number
10-03-2025
Filing Number
300793/2025
Filing Date
12-Mar-2025
Registration No
300031/2025
Registration Date
14-Mar-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijayalakshmi
Adv. GOPAKUMAR K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Devaki
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Court of the Munsiff in Irinjalakuda allowed the restoration petition filed by 70-year-old Vijayalakshmi to restore her suit for boundary fixation and perpetual injunction that was dismissed for default on 06.02.2025 due to her absence caused by post-surgical illness. Though no documentary evidence of illness was produced, the court considered her age, the nature of the suit, and the absence of delay in filing the restoration petition, and in the interest of justice, set aside the default judgment and restored the suit to file. The restoration was made conditional upon payment of Rs. 2,000 as costs to the defendants within seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Munsiff
-
11-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Additional Munsiff
-
10-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Additional Munsiff
-
06-Dec-2025
For Counter
Additional Munsiff
-
15-Oct-2025
For Counter
Additional Munsiff
-
13-Aug-2025
For Counter
Additional Munsiff
-
05-Jul-2025
For Steps
Additional Munsiff
-
20-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 300031/2025
The Court of the Munsiff in Irinjalakuda allowed the restoration petition filed by 70-year-old Vijayalakshmi to restore her suit for boundary fixation and perpetual injunction that was dismissed for default on 06.02.2025 due to her absence caused by post-surgical illness. Though no documentary evidence of illness was produced, the court considered her age, the nature of the suit, and the absence of delay in filing the restoration petition, and in the interest of justice, set aside the default judgment and restored the suit to file. The restoration was made conditional upon payment of Rs. 2,000 as costs to the defendants within seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts