Nanikutty Amma vs Amballur N S S Karayogam No. 3222 represented by Secretary Kalasagaran C Advocate - JAYACHANDRAN K A, JAYACHANDRAN K A, JAYACHANDRAN K AANAND ASOK T,, JAYACHANDRAN K AANAND ASOK T,SHAJIL P M,, JAYACHANDRAN K AANAND ASOK T,SHAJIL P M,JEETHU, — 162/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7, rule 1,section 26. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 05-Aug-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR140005342026

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

2-Additional Munsiff

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7, rule 1,section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nanikutty Amma

    Adv. JOY T I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amballur N S S Karayogam No. 3222 represented by Secretary Kalasagaran C Advocate - JAYACHANDRAN K A, JAYACHANDRAN K A, JAYACHANDRAN K AANAND ASOK T,, JAYACHANDRAN K AANAND ASOK T,SHAJIL P M,, JAYACHANDRAN K AANAND ASOK T,SHAJIL P M,JEETHU,

  2. 2.Amballur N S S Karayogham represented by President C Murali

    Adv. JAYACHANDRAN K A,JAYACHANDRAN K A ANAND ASOK T SHAJIL P M JEETHU

  3. 3.Amballur N S S Karayogam represented by Election Officer S Krishnakumar

    Adv. JAYACHANDRAN K A

Case History

  1. 05-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Written Statement

    Additional Munsiff

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Nanikutty Amma v. Amballur NSS Karayogam (2026) Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected 98-year-old Nanikutty Amma's request for an interim mandatory injunction to include her name in the voters' list for an NSS Karayogam election. Despite claiming she paid ₹1,185 in arrears on 26.02.2026, the court found insufficient evidence the payment was properly communicated or appropriated toward her dues. Critically, she failed to file objections within the prescribed timeframe after the preliminary voters' list publication, approaching the court only after finalization. The court held that voting rights in associations are statutory, not fundamental, and refused to interfere with established election procedures absent mala fides or natural justice violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Additional Munsiff

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional Munsiff

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional Munsiff

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional Munsiff

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional Munsiff

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Nanikutty Amma v. Amballur NSS Karayogam (2026) Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected 98-year-old Nanikutty Amma's request for an interim mandatory injunction to include her name in the voters' list for an NSS Karayogam election. Despite claiming she paid ₹1,185 in arrears on 26.02.2026, the court found insufficient evidence the payment was properly communicated or appropriated toward her dues. Critically, she failed to file objections within the prescribed timeframe after the preliminary voters' list publication, approaching the court only after finalization. The court held that voting rights in associations are statutory, not fundamental, and refused to interfere with established election procedures absent mala fides or natural justice violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case