The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Paulson T V Advocate - JUSTEENA.M.P — 300144/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR140005322023
Filing Number
300563/2023
Filing Date
02-03-2023
Registration No
300144/2023
Registration Date
02-03-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The South Indian Bank Ltd
Adv. Fini P D
Respondent(s)
Paulson T V Advocate - JUSTEENA.M.P
Shereen Nazar
T O George,
Raji Poulose
Amrutha Paul
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Munsiff
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Listed to
Pre trial steps
Pre trial steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 29-01-2026 | Listed to |
| 07-11-2025 | Pre trial steps |
| 15-09-2025 | Pre trial steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS No. 144/2023 South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Paulson T.V & Others The Munsiff's Court decreed the bank's money recovery suit against the defendants who defaulted on an educational loan of Rs. 2.5 lakh sanctioned in 2011. The court found the defendants liable for Rs. 3,01,488.17 plus 12% interest until decree and 6% thereafter, holding that the loan agreement, multiple debt acknowledgments, and demand notice substantiated the bank's claim. The defendants' absence at trial and failure to present contrary evidence resulted in ex parte judgment favoring the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 144/2023 South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Paulson T.V & Others The Munsiff's Court decreed the bank's money recovery suit against the defendants who defaulted on an educational loan of Rs. 2.5 lakh sanctioned in 2011. The court found the defendants liable for Rs. 3,01,488.17 plus 12% interest until decree and 6% thereafter, holding that the loan agreement, multiple debt acknowledgments, and demand notice substantiated the bank's claim. The defendants' absence at trial and failure to present contrary evidence resulted in ex parte judgment favoring the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts