Peninsula Chits Pvt Ltd vs Jiji — 300098/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21Rule1011. Disposed: Contested--FULL SATISFACTION OF THE DECREE IS RECORDED. on 11th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLTR140001292024
e-Filing Number
22-01-2024
Filing Number
300130/2024
Filing Date
24-01-2024
Registration No
300098/2024
Registration Date
02-02-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--FULL SATISFACTION OF THE DECREE IS RECORDED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Peninsula Chits Pvt Ltd
Adv. WILSON JOSE
Respondent(s)
Jiji
Beevi
Jolly
Rashi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Munsiff
Disposed
For production of documents/Affidavit
Call on
Return of warrant
Return of warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 26-02-2026 | Call on | |
| 30-01-2026 | Return of warrant | |
| 27-01-2026 | Return of warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Munsiff Court dismissed the execution petition against judgment debtors 3 and 4, finding that the decretal amount had been fully satisfied based on a certificate issued by the decree holder (Peninsula Chits Ltd.) dated 23.02.2026. Although the decree holder later claimed the payment was entered under this execution petition due to clerical error and actually belonged to another petition, the court rejected this contention, holding that once the decree holder admitted executing the certificate stating full satisfaction of EP 98/2024, it cannot subsequently plead clerical error to discredit its own document. The execution petition was therefore closed with full satisfaction recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Munsiff Court dismissed the execution petition against judgment debtors 3 and 4, finding that the decretal amount had been fully satisfied based on a certificate issued by the decree holder (Peninsula Chits Ltd.) dated 23.02.2026. Although the decree holder later claimed the payment was entered under this execution petition due to clerical error and actually belonged to another petition, the court rejected this contention, holding that once the decree holder admitted executing the certificate stating full satisfaction of EP 98/2024, it cannot subsequently plead clerical error to discredit its own document. The execution petition was therefore closed with full satisfaction recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts