REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ATHIRAPILLY POLICE STATION(Appeared) vs ANEESH @ UNDAMANI — 200862/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section S 448,341,323,307,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 06th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR130006632024
Filing Number
200401/2019
Filing Date
24-12-2019
Registration No
200862/2019
Registration Date
24-12-2019
Court
Sub Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
2-Additional Sub Judge
Decision Date
06th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
ATHIRAPILLY
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ATHIRAPILLY POLICE STATION(Appeared)
Respondent(s)
ANEESH @ UNDAMANI
VIJEESH
LALITHA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub Judge
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For hearing under section 232 CRPC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-05-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 26-05-2026 | For hearing under section 232 CRPC |
| 23-05-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 01-04-2026 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sessions Case 862/2019 (Thrissur Division) The court acquitted three accused (Aneesh, Vijeesh, and Lalitha) of charges under IPC Sections 448, 341, 323, 324, and 307 r/w 34. Though the prosecution proved an assault occurred on April 10, 2019, the key injured witnesses and eyewitnesses turned hostile, denying the accused's identity. Without credible identification linking the accused to the crime, the court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and granted acquittal with cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case 862/2019 (Thrissur Division) The court acquitted three accused (Aneesh, Vijeesh, and Lalitha) of charges under IPC Sections 448, 341, 323, 324, and 307 r/w 34. Though the prosecution proved an assault occurred on April 10, 2019, the key injured witnesses and eyewitnesses turned hostile, denying the accused's identity. Without credible identification linking the accused to the crime, the court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and granted acquittal with cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts