Anthonykutty vs Domini @ Dominic — 54/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 9 order IX. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
Restor.Ptn - RESTORATION PETITION
CNR: KLTR130006172025
Filing Number
3430/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Court
Sub Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
2-Additional Sub Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anthonykutty
Adv. DAVIS POTTAKARAN
-
2.George
Adv. DAVIS POTTAKARAN
-
3.Paul
Adv. DAVIS POTTAKARAN
-
4.Naijo
Adv. DAVIS POTTAKARAN
-
5.Shaijo Rep. Anthonykutty
Adv. DAVIS POTTAKARAN
-
6.Shaiji
Adv. DAVIS POTTAKARAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Domini @ Dominic
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by Anthonikutty, George, Paul, and others to restore their partition suit that was dismissed for default on 13.08.2025. The court accepted their explanation that the petitioner suffered from dengue fever and could not appear in court, found no willful latches, and noted the petition was filed within time on 15.09.2025. The court restored the suit to file in the interests of justice, as denying restoration would leave the petitioners without remedy for property partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Additional Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Additional Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Additional Sub Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
For paper Publication
Additional Sub Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
For paper Publication
Additional Sub Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
For paper Publication
Additional Sub Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Return of notice
Additional Sub Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2025
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by Anthonikutty, George, Paul, and others to restore their partition suit that was dismissed for default on 13.08.2025. The court accepted their explanation that the petitioner suffered from dengue fever and could not appear in court, found no willful latches, and noted the petition was filed within time on 15.09.2025. The court restored the suit to file in the interests of justice, as denying restoration would leave the petitioners without remedy for property partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts