Jakson Chummar vs Sini — 200098/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order41Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLTR130006102024

e-Filing Number

09-07-2024

Filing Number

200876/2024

Filing Date

10-Jul-2024

Registration No

200098/2024

Registration Date

10-Jul-2024

Court

Sub Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

2-Additional Sub Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order41Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jakson Chummar

    Adv. K. Gopinadhan

  2. 2.Solly Jakson

    Adv. K. Gopinadhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sini

  2. 2.LIS Partnership Firm Represented By Md Kuriyachan Chacko

  3. 3.Kuriachan Chacko Managing Trustee

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging the attachment of property sold to them in 2014. The court held that the appellants failed to establish themselves as bona fide purchasers, finding the transaction suspicious due to: the vendors' multiple pending liabilities and debts at the time of sale, the purchasers' complete lack of due diligence regarding the vendors' financial status, and absence of independent evidence proving actual payment despite claims of substantial consideration. The court confirmed that the property attachment remains valid as the transaction appears designed to defeat creditors' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sub Judge

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional Sub Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional Sub Judge

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  10. 22-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  12. 18-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  14. 15-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional Sub Judge

  15. 26-Jul-2025

    For L C R

    Additional Sub Judge

  16. 23-May-2025

    For L C R

    Additional Sub Judge

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Bcf and steps

    Additional Sub Judge

  18. 13-Dec-2024

    Return of notice

    Additional Sub Judge

  19. 17-Oct-2024

    Paper Publication produced-Await report Affixture

    Additional Sub Judge

  20. 23-Aug-2024

    Issue notice

    Additional Sub Judge

  21. 10-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 10-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200098/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging the attachment of property sold to them in 2014. The court held that the appellants failed to establish themselves as bona fide purchasers, finding the transaction suspicious due to: the vendors' multiple pending liabilities and debts at the time of sale, the purchasers' complete lack of due diligence regarding the vendors' financial status, and absence of independent evidence proving actual payment despite claims of substantial consideration. The court confirmed that the property attachment remains valid as the transaction appears designed to defeat creditors' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case