James vs Devassy Advocate - Lisan.V.P — 200105/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41,1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLTR130005962018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200105/2018
Filing Date
14-08-2018
Registration No
200105/2018
Registration Date
14-08-2018
Court
Sub Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
James
Adv. SUDHIR BABY K.S
Respondent(s)
Devassy Advocate - Lisan.V.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 07-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 21-01-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 06-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the trial court's decision granting a perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff-respondent. The court found that the defendant failed to establish an easement by implied grant over the alleged pathway on the southern boundary of the plaintiff's property, as an advocate commissioner's inspection revealed the entrance was overgrown with vegetation and showed no signs of active use, contradicting the defendant's claim of a continuous and apparent right of way. The court concluded the plaintiff proved the defendant trespassed and encroached upon the property, entitling the plaintiff to injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the trial court's decision granting a perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff-respondent. The court found that the defendant failed to establish an easement by implied grant over the alleged pathway on the southern boundary of the plaintiff's property, as an advocate commissioner's inspection revealed the entrance was overgrown with vegetation and showed no signs of active use, contradicting the defendant's claim of a continuous and apparent right of way. The court concluded the plaintiff proved the defendant trespassed and encroached upon the property, entitling the plaintiff to injunctive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts