Arun vs Babu Advocate - C R Anirudhan — 200081/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR130002562022
Filing Number
200190/2022
Filing Date
04-Apr-2022
Registration No
200081/2022
Registration Date
04-Apr-2022
Court
Sub Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arun
Adv. Ramesh Kuttala
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babu Advocate - C R Anirudhan
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
For Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
For Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
For hearing on IA
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Issue notice
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
For hearing on IA
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Call with IA
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Call with IA
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Call with IA
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
For Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
For Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Bcf and steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Bcf and steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Bcf and steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Issues
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Jul-2023
For Hearing
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 200081/2022 The court granted Arun's petition under Order 38 Rule 4 of CPC, finding likelihood that respondent Babu would dispose of property to defeat a prospective decree. The respondent was directed to furnish security of ₹10,63,065/- or show cause why he should not, with the property conditionally attached in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2022
No sitting notified
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 200081/2022
Case Summary: 200081/2022 The court granted Arun's petition under Order 38 Rule 4 of CPC, finding likelihood that respondent Babu would dispose of property to defeat a prospective decree. The respondent was directed to furnish security of ₹10,63,065/- or show cause why he should not, with the property conditionally attached in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts