Anthony vs Jacob Advocate - XAVIOUR N.O. — 200013/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLTR130001652023

e-Filing Number

21-03-2023

Filing Number

161/2023

Filing Date

21-Mar-2023

Registration No

200013/2023

Registration Date

21-Mar-2023

Court

Sub Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anthony

    Adv. WILSON JOSE

  2. 2.Sijo

    Adv. WILSON JOSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jacob Advocate - XAVIOUR N.O.

  2. 2.Biju

    Adv. XAVIOUR N.O.

  3. 3.Unnikrishnan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Anthony and Sijo v. Jacob Advocate (200013/2023) The court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal for an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing natural water flow through defendants' properties. While the court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that excess water flows through the defendants' land, it held that the balance of convenience favored the defendants, as the Advocate Commissioner's inspection revealed alternative drainage routes (eastern canal) available to the plaintiffs. The court ruled that granting the injunction would cause greater hardship to the defendants than refusing it would to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Sub Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    No sitting notified

    Principal Sub Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    For Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    For commission report

    Principal Sub Judge

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    For Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  15. 22-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Principal Sub Judge

  16. 23-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  19. 01-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  20. 21-May-2025

    Listed to

    Principal Sub Judge

  21. 25-Mar-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  22. 22-Feb-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  23. 27-Jan-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  24. 07-Jan-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  25. 05-Jan-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  26. 18-Nov-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  27. 04-Nov-2024

    Judge on leave / duty

    Principal Sub Judge

  28. 24-Oct-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  29. 14-Oct-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  30. 13-Sep-2024

    Listed to

    Principal Sub Judge

  31. 05-Aug-2024

    No sitting notified

    Principal Sub Judge

  32. 13-Jun-2024

    No sitting notified

    Principal Sub Judge

  33. 30-May-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  34. 06-Apr-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  35. 30-Mar-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  36. 22-Mar-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  37. 16-Mar-2024

    For further hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  38. 23-Feb-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  39. 16-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  40. 27-Jan-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  41. 12-Jan-2024

    For further hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  42. 05-Jan-2024

    For Hearing

    Principal Sub Judge

  43. 09-Nov-2023

    Listed to

    Principal Sub Judge

  44. 12-Oct-2023

    For L C R

    Principal Sub Judge

  45. 24-Aug-2023

    For L C R

    Principal Sub Judge

  46. 15-Jul-2023

    For L C R

    Principal Sub Judge

  47. 07-Jun-2023

    For L C R

    Principal Sub Judge

  48. 12-Apr-2023

    OrderView PDF

  49. 12-Apr-2023

    For L C R

    Principal Sub Judge

  50. 31-Mar-2023

    Call with IA

    Principal Sub Judge

  51. 24-Mar-2023

    Call with IA

    Principal Sub Judge

  52. 22-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 21-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200013/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anthony and Sijo v. Jacob Advocate (200013/2023) The court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal for an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing natural water flow through defendants' properties. While the court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that excess water flows through the defendants' land, it held that the balance of convenience favored the defendants, as the Advocate Commissioner's inspection revealed alternative drainage routes (eastern canal) available to the plaintiffs. The court ruled that granting the injunction would cause greater hardship to the defendants than refusing it would to the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case