ABDUL MAJEED vs DILSHAD K.K. Advocate - Arun Raj V S, SUMA.N — 102064/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed in part on 24th March 2026.
OP MV - OP (MOTOR VEHICLE)
CNR: KLTR110025952019
Filing Number
102064/2019
Filing Date
28-12-2019
Registration No
102064/2019
Registration Date
28-12-2019
Court
Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed in part
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABDUL MAJEED
Adv. P.K.JOHN
FOUSIYA T.
JINSIYA K.M.
RAHANAS K.M. MINOR REP.BY HIS FATHER ABDUL MAJEED
FATHIMA RINSIYA MINOR REP.BY HIS FATHER ABDUL MAJEED
Respondent(s)
DILSHAD K.K. Advocate - Arun Raj V S, SUMA.N
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 27-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 102064/2019 Court Decision: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹20,12,400 in compensation to the parents (petitioners 1-2) of Favas K.M., who died following a motorcycle accident on October 19, 2019. The tribunal found the motorcycle rider (respondent 3) liable for rash and negligent riding, and held the insurer (respondent 2) responsible for payment, though the insurer can recover from the vehicle owner (respondent 1) given policy violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 102064/2019 Court Decision: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹20,12,400 in compensation to the parents (petitioners 1-2) of Favas K.M., who died following a motorcycle accident on October 19, 2019. The tribunal found the motorcycle rider (respondent 3) liable for rash and negligent riding, and held the insurer (respondent 2) responsible for payment, though the insurer can recover from the vehicle owner (respondent 1) given policy violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts