Gopinath vs Sebastian Advocate - Ramesh Kuttala, Ramesh Kuttala, Ramesh KuttalaVisvajith, — 100068/2023
Case under --- Section section 18(1)B. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)
CNR: KLTR110019902023
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-10-2023
Filing Number
101795/2023
Filing Date
09-10-2023
Registration No
100068/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopinath
Adv. IBEN MATHEN M
Respondent(s)
Sebastian Advocate - Ramesh Kuttala, Ramesh Kuttala, Ramesh KuttalaVisvajith,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 28-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100068/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed Sebastian (tenant/respondent in appeal) sought to condone a 906-day delay in filing a cross-objection against the trial court's finding that the landlord's need was bonafide in a rent control dispute. The Rent Control Appellate Authority rejected the petition, finding insufficient explanation for the delay. The court held that while liberal construction applies to limitation laws, delay cannot be condoned without reasonable cause, and notably, findings can be challenged in appeal without filing a formal cross-objection memorandum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100068/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed Sebastian (tenant/respondent in appeal) sought to condone a 906-day delay in filing a cross-objection against the trial court's finding that the landlord's need was bonafide in a rent control dispute. The Rent Control Appellate Authority rejected the petition, finding insufficient explanation for the delay. The court held that while liberal construction applies to limitation laws, delay cannot be condoned without reasonable cause, and notably, findings can be challenged in appeal without filing a formal cross-objection memorandum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts