RATNAVATHY vs MOHAMMED P.S. (Died) — 100581/2020
Case under Ia/8/2025 Classification : Application to Reopen Evidence Section MOHAMMED P.S. (Died). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
OP MV - OP (MOTOR VEHICLE)
CNR: KLTR110006352020
Filing Number
100581/2020
Filing Date
20-05-2020
Registration No
100581/2020
Registration Date
20-05-2020
Court
Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RATNAVATHY
Adv. JEEJO VARGHESE
NEETHU
NAVYA
Respondent(s)
MOHAMMED P.S. (Died)
MOHAMMED SHAN
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Kadeeja
Shihab
Asha
Jemu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 28-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OP(MV) 581/2020 Court Decision: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹8,28,100 in compensation to the petitioners (widow and two daughters of deceased S. Kumar) following his death in a scooter accident on September 6, 2019. The tribunal found the scooter rider (respondent No. 2) was negligent, held the insurer (United India Insurance) primarily liable for payment, and allowed the insurer to recover from the vehicle owner's legal representatives, noting the rider was unlicensed and a minor at the time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OP(MV) 581/2020 Court Decision: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹8,28,100 in compensation to the petitioners (widow and two daughters of deceased S. Kumar) following his death in a scooter accident on September 6, 2019. The tribunal found the scooter rider (respondent No. 2) was negligent, held the insurer (United India Insurance) primarily liable for payment, and allowed the insurer to recover from the vehicle owner's legal representatives, noting the rider was unlicensed and a minor at the time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts