santhosh vs benny varghese Advocate - LEO V S — 94/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure (Kerala Amendment) Act,1963 Section 374. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLTR110004702026
Filing Number
29/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
94/2026
Registration Date
21-Mar-2026
Court
Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.santhosh
Adv. SUNIL KONNANATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.benny varghese Advocate - LEO V S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Judgement
Summary of Case 94/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Irinjalakuda allowed Santhosh's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and set aside the trial court's sentence of four months imprisonment and ₹40,000 compensation. The court permitted compounding of the offence after both parties reached a settlement, which operates as an acquittal under Section 359(8) of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
-
17-Apr-2026
Order
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission
Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
-
16-Apr-2026
Oders in Cmp
Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
-
10-Apr-2026
Oders in Cmp
Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
-
07-Apr-2026
Call with IA
Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
-
28-Mar-2026
Call with Mp
Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2026
Summary of Case 94/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Irinjalakuda allowed Santhosh's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and set aside the trial court's sentence of four months imprisonment and ₹40,000 compensation. The court permitted compounding of the offence after both parties reached a settlement, which operates as an acquittal under Section 359(8) of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts