SUNIKUMAR .K.S., SO SUBRAMANIYAN vs LATHA WO NITHYANANDAN — 100204/2013
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
OP MV - OP (MOTOR VEHICLE)
CNR: KLTR110001782013
Filing Number
100204/2013
Filing Date
07-03-2013
Registration No
100204/2013
Registration Date
07-03-2013
Court
Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIKUMAR .K.S., SO SUBRAMANIYAN
Adv. K.P.POULOSE MURIMATTOM, K.P.POULOSE MURIMATTOM
Respondent(s)
LATHA WO NITHYANANDAN
NITHYANADHAN ,VADAYKKAPURATH HOUSE
THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD SOUTH JN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 21-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OP(MV) 204/2013 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held the mini lorry driver (Respondent No.2) solely negligent for a 2012 collision with the petitioner's autorickshaw. The tribunal awarded the petitioner ₹8,06,200 plus ₹15,20,000 additional compensation (as mandated by the High Court's appellate order), at 9% and 8% interest respectively, rejecting the insurance company's claim that the petitioner's evasive maneuver constituted contributory negligence. The insurer (United India Insurance) is liable for full payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OP(MV) 204/2013 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held the mini lorry driver (Respondent No.2) solely negligent for a 2012 collision with the petitioner's autorickshaw. The tribunal awarded the petitioner ₹8,06,200 plus ₹15,20,000 additional compensation (as mandated by the High Court's appellate order), at 9% and 8% interest respectively, rejecting the insurance company's claim that the petitioner's evasive maneuver constituted contributory negligence. The insurer (United India Insurance) is liable for full payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts