State of Kerala (Police) vs NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES Pvt Ltd Advocate - V M MAHESH — 900044/2016
Case under Ipc \ Section 120(B),406,420,34. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR090000102016
Next Hearing
27th June 2026
Filing Number
900044/2016
Filing Date
01-07-2016
Registration No
900044/2016
Registration Date
01-07-2016
Court
ACJM, Thrissur
Judge
1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
1164
Police Station
TOWN WEST,THRISSUR
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst Public Prosecutor(ACJM,Thrissur)
Respondent(s)
NANO EXCEL ENTERPRISES Pvt Ltd Advocate - V M MAHESH
NANO EXCEL CORPORATION Ltd
Adv. V M MAHESH
NANO POWER CORPORATION Ltd
Adv. V M MAHESH
HARRISH BABU MADINENNI
Adv. V M MAHESH
PATRIC THOMAS
Adv. V M MAHESH
CHINNA RAO SWAYAMVARAPU
Adv. V M MAHESH
P P RENGA REDDY
Adv. V M MAHESH
MEERA HARRISH K
Adv. V M MAHESH
RADHA SUNDHARA RAJAH
Adv. V M MAHESH
PRASANTH SUNDHAR RAJA
Adv. V M MAHESH
CHEDELLA SUBASHINI
Adv. V M MAHESH
KUMARI RAJAH
Adv. V M MAHESH
LAGADAPATI SARATH BABU@SARATH
MOHAMMED ASHARAF
Adv. ADV NAVEESH,ADV NAVEESH ADV NAVEESH
LONAPPAN
DHARMARATHNAM
BABU
RADHAKRISHNAN
RAMESHKUMAR
RANJAN
RASHEED
FRANCIS
SASI
CHANDRAN NAIR
VINOD
Adv. ADV NAVEESH,ADV NAVEESH ADV NAVEESH
SAJEEV KARUN
SASINDRAN@MURALI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional Cheif Judicial Magistrate
Call on
Call with claim petition
No sitting notified
Call on
Stayed. Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Call on |
| 18-05-2026 | Call with claim petition |
| 16-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 11-03-2026 | Call on |
| 20-12-2025 | Stayed. Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 44/2016 Accused no. 21 (Rasheed) filed a discharge petition under Section 239 CrPC, claiming groundless charges in a money circulation scheme case involving Nano Excel companies. The court dismissed the petition, finding sufficient prima facie evidence against him for conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, cheating, and violations of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation (Banning) Act, 1978, based on witness statements, bank records, and company documents showing his involvement in promoting the illegal scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 44/2016 Accused no. 21 (Rasheed) filed a discharge petition under Section 239 CrPC, claiming groundless charges in a money circulation scheme case involving Nano Excel companies. The court dismissed the petition, finding sufficient prima facie evidence against him for conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, cheating, and violations of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation (Banning) Act, 1978, based on witness statements, bank records, and company documents showing his involvement in promoting the illegal scheme. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts