Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi vs Hasna Advocate - SHEMITHA P S — 299/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Status: For Counter. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

For Counter Next hearing 19-May-2026 this date has passed

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLTR010111452025

Filing Number

3271/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

299/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi

    Adv. VIBIN CHACKO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hasna Advocate - SHEMITHA P S

  2. 2.Minor Nyla

    Adv. SHEMITHA P S

  3. 3.Minor Nyma

    Adv. SHEMITHA P S

  4. 4.Minor Nasneen

    Adv. SHEMITHA P S

  5. 5.Muhammed Nasih

    Adv. SHEMITHA P S

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    For Counter

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    For Counter

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Issue notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thrissur allowed a petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 10-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court found no willful negligence or gross laches on the petitioner's part and determined sufficient cause existed to grant a liberal approach. The petition was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the respondent on or before 17-02-2026, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    For Payment

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  8. 24-Jan-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Adjourned

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    For Counter

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  12. 09-Dec-2025

    Adjourned

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  13. 12-Nov-2025

    Issue notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 299/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thrissur allowed a petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 10-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court found no willful negligence or gross laches on the petitioner's part and determined sufficient cause existed to grant a liberal approach. The petition was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the respondent on or before 17-02-2026, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case