Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi vs Hasna Advocate - SHEMITHA P S — 299/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Status: For Counter. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLTR010111452025

For Counter

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3271/2025

Filing Date

10-11-2025

Registration No

299/2025

Registration Date

10-11-2025

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29
Crl.MP/6939/2025 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi
Crl.MP/6940/2025 Classification : Petition Section Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi
Crl.MP/6941/2025 Classification : Application To Accept Power Of Attorney Section Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi

Petitioner(s)

Nishad represented by Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Basheer Karumppamveettil Mammi

Adv. VIBIN CHACKO

Respondent(s)

Hasna Advocate - SHEMITHA P S

Minor Nyla

Adv. SHEMITHA P S

Minor Nyma

Adv. SHEMITHA P S

Minor Nasneen

Adv. SHEMITHA P S

Muhammed Nasih

Adv. SHEMITHA P S

Hearing History

Judge: 3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

28-03-2026

For Counter

11-03-2026

For Counter

18-02-2026

Issue notice

17-02-2026

No sitting notified

30-01-2026

For Payment

Interim Orders

30-01-2026
Order

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thrissur allowed a petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 10-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court found no willful negligence or gross laches on the petitioner's part and determined sufficient cause existed to grant a liberal approach. The petition was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the respondent on or before 17-02-2026, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thrissur allowed a petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 10-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court found no willful negligence or gross laches on the petitioner's part and determined sufficient cause existed to grant a liberal approach. The petition was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the respondent on or before 17-02-2026, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case